Skip to main content
Shannon Taylor

Shannon Taylor

Democrat

Henrico County Commonwealth's Attorney

Non-Incumbent · Public Record
R2B
PIP Political Integrity Pledge · Political Integrity PAC
  • No Corporate PAC Money
  • Stock Trading Ban
  • Lobbying Ban for Former Members
  • Overturn Citizens United

Primary: August 2026 Last updated 2026-04-27

T Transparency
61.7%

Top positive drivers

  • T16 Created first-in-Virginia police integrity position reviewing use-of-force, body cameras, misconduct. Citizen hotline. 4/4
  • T3 Pledged stock trading ban; attacks Wittman's $2.56M trades on Armed Services Committee. 3.75/4
  • T7 VPM (PBS); Virginia Mercury questionnaire; WRIC; WaPo; Fox5 DC; AG debate; hostile Dominion criticism. 3.75/4

Top negative drivers

  • T2 No proactive financial disclosure beyond legal minimums. 0/4
  • T17 No documented positions on immigration system transparency. 0/4
  • T18 No documented positions on education transparency. 0/4
View all 25 criteria
  • T1 Campaign website with contact info; public events. As CA held community events. No specific frequency/schedule. 2.88/4
  • T2 No proactive financial disclosure beyond legal minimums. 0/4
  • T3 Pledged stock trading ban; attacks Wittman's $2.56M trades on Armed Services Committee. 3.75/4
  • T4 Criticizes Wittman on End Citizens United Most Corrupt list. Took $650K+ from Dominion Energy in AG race (state-level). 2.88/4
  • T5 FEC filings available. No proactive donor tools or breakdowns. 1/4
  • T6 Campaign website; press releases; media interviews (VPM, Virginia Mercury, WRIC, Hopium Chronicles). 2.88/4
  • T7 VPM (PBS); Virginia Mercury questionnaire; WRIC; WaPo; Fox5 DC; AG debate; hostile Dominion criticism. 3.75/4
  • T8 EMILYs List; Everytown; New Democrat Coalition; DCCC Red to Blue. 2.88/4
  • T9 Campaign website with press releases; social media; press releases on policy. 2.88/4
  • T10 Lower costs; hold the corrupt accountable; references everyday struggles. No multilingual materials. 2.88/4
  • T11 Criticizes Wittman for raising healthcare premiums; lower prescription drug costs. No transparency mechanisms. 2.25/4
  • T12 References rising costs generally. No specific housing transparency tools. 1/4
  • T13 Goes after price gouging and corporate cost manipulation. No specific disclosure mechanisms. 2.25/4
  • T14 Anti-corruption platform implies spending accountability. No specific proposals. 2.25/4
  • T15 Data centers must use clean energy; should pay for energy costs not pass to residents. 2.88/4
  • T16 Created first-in-Virginia police integrity position reviewing use-of-force, body cameras, misconduct. Citizen hotline. 4/4
  • T17 No documented positions on immigration system transparency. 0/4
  • T18 No documented positions on education transparency. 0/4
  • T19 Anti-corruption framing; End Citizens United connection; clean elections stance. 2.88/4
  • T20 Prosecutorial background centered on accountability; stock trading ban; Wittman self-enrichment callout. 3.13/4
  • T21 Multiple media interviews across AG and congressional campaigns. Responded to hostile Dominion coverage. 3.13/4
  • T22 No PolitiFact ratings. No false claims documented. Wittman stock claims verified. 25-year prosecutorial career. 3.13/4
  • T23 Created police integrity position and citizen misconduct hotline (functionally a reporting mechanism). 2.88/4
  • T24 No specific FOIA reform or open data proposals. 0/4
  • T25 Anti-corruption matches prosecutorial career; reproductive rights matches pledge; gun safety matches Everytown; police integrity matches creation. 3.75/4
E Efficiency
58.2%

Top positive drivers

  • E9 90% homicide conviction; first woman elected Henrico CA; 756 trafficking charges; 1500+ drug charges; opioid task force. 4/4
  • E16 25 years prosecutor; diversion programs; opioid task force 50+ partners; human trafficking support; police integrity. 4/4
  • E6 13+ years managing CA office; first woman elected; reelected 3 times; 62.68% in 2019; $875K+ in 5 months. 3.75/4

Top negative drivers

  • E14 No documented immigration efficiency positions. 0/4
  • E15 No documented education efficiency positions. 0/4
  • E20 No national security cost-effectiveness positions. 0/4
View all 25 criteria
  • E1 No sunset clauses or benchmarks named. 90% homicide conviction rate is outcome metric from prior role. 2.25/4
  • E2 Cites Wittman $2.56M trades; $1T Medicaid cuts; 23K+ Virginians losing healthcare. 2.88/4
  • E3 Anti-corruption framing implies effectiveness evaluation. No specific proposals. 2.25/4
  • E4 Human trafficking victim support; opioid task force with 50+ partners; diversion programs; citizen hotline. 3.13/4
  • E5 Data center energy policy position. No broader IT modernization proposals. 2.25/4
  • E6 13+ years managing CA office; first woman elected; reelected 3 times; 62.68% in 2019; $875K+ in 5 months. 3.75/4
  • E7 Opioid task force with 50+ partners; VA Association of CAs President; Democratic + law enforcement endorsements. 3.13/4
  • E8 Stock trading ban references existing legislation; healthcare references existing programs; data center implementation. 2.88/4
  • E9 90% homicide conviction; first woman elected Henrico CA; 756 trafficking charges; 1500+ drug charges; opioid task force. 4/4
  • E10 Stock trading ban; police integrity review process; anti-corruption platform. 2.88/4
  • E11 Lower prescription costs; opposes Medicaid cuts; protects affordable healthcare. No specific mechanisms. 2.25/4
  • E12 References housing affordability. No specific housing supply mechanisms. 1/4
  • E13 Data centers must use clean energy and pay own costs; investing in energy for jobs. 2.88/4
  • E14 No documented immigration efficiency positions. 0/4
  • E15 No documented education efficiency positions. 0/4
  • E16 25 years prosecutor; diversion programs; opioid task force 50+ partners; human trafficking support; police integrity. 4/4
  • E17 Good-paying jobs through energy, infrastructure, small businesses. No specific programs. 2.25/4
  • E18 Anti-corruption implies spending efficiency; criticizes Wittman self-enrichment. No specific proposals. 2.25/4
  • E19 Investing in infrastructure for jobs. No specific delivery proposals. 2.25/4
  • E20 No national security cost-effectiveness positions. 0/4
  • E21 General platform on making government work. No specific processing targets. 2.25/4
  • E22 Criticizes Wittman tax on beach house; opposes tax breaks for wealthy. No comprehensive framework. 2.25/4
  • E23 No positions on GAO/IG recommendations. 0/4
  • E24 Diversion programs for non-violent offenders; police integrity; opioid task force changed prosecution approach. 2.88/4
  • E25 General accountability platform. No specific agency oversight proposals. 2.25/4
A Affordability
64.2%

Top positive drivers

  • A1 Campaign centered on rising costs; skyrocketing healthcare; seniors exploited by fraudsters; Wittman beach house. 3.13/4
  • A3 Prosecuted senior fraud/exploitation; opioid task force addresses economic impacts; human trafficking support. 3.13/4
  • A8 Goes after price gouging, predatory lenders, senior scams. 25 years prosecuting fraud. 3.13/4

Top negative drivers

  • A13 No documented education affordability positions. 0/4
  • A19 No transportation affordability positions. 0/4
  • A12 References escalating housing costs. No specific mechanisms. 1/4
View all 25 criteria
  • A1 Campaign centered on rising costs; skyrocketing healthcare; seniors exploited by fraudsters; Wittman beach house. 3.13/4
  • A2 $2.56M Wittman trades; $1T Medicaid cuts; 23K+ affected; Wittman net worth growth. 2.88/4
  • A3 Prosecuted senior fraud/exploitation; opioid task force addresses economic impacts; human trafficking support. 3.13/4
  • A4 Stopping corporations from taking advantage through high interest rates and price gouging. 2.88/4
  • A5 References costs for families generally; keep more money in pocketbooks. No household-level analysis. 2.25/4
  • A6 Campaign launched during inflation; criticizes Wittman Medicaid votes; Wittman beach house tax breaks. 2.88/4
  • A7 Opposes tax breaks for wealthy. No specific redirection quantification. 2.25/4
  • A8 Goes after price gouging, predatory lenders, senior scams. 25 years prosecuting fraud. 3.13/4
  • A9 Working families; hardworking Virginians pocketbooks; families fed up with rising costs. 2.88/4
  • A10 Lowering costs is one of three campaign pillars (costs/corruption/healthcare). 2.88/4
  • A11 Lower prescription costs; opposing $1T Medicaid cuts; protecting ACA; 23K+ Virginians. 3.13/4
  • A12 References escalating housing costs. No specific mechanisms. 1/4
  • A13 No documented education affordability positions. 0/4
  • A14 Opposes Wittman beach house tax; opposes tax breaks for wealthy; supports working family pocketbooks. 2.88/4
  • A15 Goes after price gouging, predatory lenders, senior scams, organized retail theft. 25 years as prosecutor. 3.13/4
  • A16 Good-paying jobs through energy, infrastructure, small businesses. No specific wage proposals. 2.25/4
  • A17 Criticized Wittman vote to slash food assistance. No specific food mechanisms. 1/4
  • A18 Data centers should pay own energy costs not pass to residents; investing in energy. 2.88/4
  • A19 No transportation affordability positions. 0/4
  • A20 Three-pillar platform (costs/corruption/healthcare). Not connected into coherent cross-cutting strategy. 2.25/4
  • A21 25-year prosecutorial career on consumer protection/fraud matches rhetoric. First Democrat elected in 24 years. 3.13/4
  • A22 Opposes $1T Medicaid cuts; protects ACA; committed to Medicare/Social Security; criticizes food assistance cuts. 3.13/4
  • A23 Seniors (fraud protection); working families; healthcare broadly; reproductive rights. 2.88/4
  • A24 Healthcare broad; lowering costs broad; anti-corruption benefits all. 2.88/4
  • A25 EMILYs List; DCCC Red to Blue; New Democrat Coalition; Everytown; law enforcement leaders; Gov Spanberger; Sen Kaine. 2.88/4

Scored from publicly available information. Research in progress.

Platform research is in progress.

Non-Incumbent · Public Record

Scored on publicly available information only — platform statements, prior office, news coverage. Same criteria as the Questionnaire pathway, without direct candidate input.

Scoring Summary

Axis Base Pledge Bonus Final
Transparency 61.7% 61.7%
Efficiency 58.2% 58.2%
Affordability 64.2% 64.2%
Overall TEA Average of the three axes 61.4%

Financial Breakdown

Financial detail — individual giving, PAC contributions, transfers, and personal finances — will appear here when FEC data ingestion ships. This tab is reserved so the layout stays consistent when the feature launches.

Support Us